Validation of a Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire for Patients with Infantile Hemangioma and Their Families - the IH-QOL-RO.

Introduction:Despite the fact that infantile haemangioma is one of the most common benign tumour of the child, the impact of this pathology on the quality of life of patients and their families has not aroused much interest in health services research. Several tools have been proposed to date to assess this, but there is no Romanian standardised instrument yet. Taking as a model the questionnaire developed and validated in English by Chamlin et al (2015), we translated, culturally adapted and piloted this instrument into Romanian. The questionnaire was administered during two years, between August 2019 and August 2021, to the parents of children with a diagnosis of infantile hemangioma who attended "M. S. Curie" Children's Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. Inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of infantile hemangioma and children under the age of 24 months. Other comorbidities which may have caused other health impairments were considered as exclusion criteria. Response rate was 100% for all items in the questionnaire. A total of 112 family respondents were included for analysis. Classic psychometric tests were used. Results:Based on the 29 standardized original items, the four scales have Cronbach-alpha values ranging from 0.489 (CSI), 0.609 (PSF), 0.689 (PEF) to 0.719 (CPS). The proposed final Romanian version includes 26 standardised items. The Cronbach-alpha values improve marginally: 0.63 (PSF), 0.67 (CSI), 0.72 (PEF) and 0.733 (0.78) (CPS). Conclusion:We propose the 21-item scale of the IH-QOL-RO as the Romanian version of the IH-QOL®. The instrument has been culturally adapted and is ready to use in paediatric clinics. We recommend the use of IH-QOL-RO in a longitudinal study design as a measure of health-related quality of life and to complete the classical set of psychometric tests with the 48-hour test-retest reliability.

Causal and Associational Language in Observational Health Research: A Systematic Evaluation.

We estimated the degree to which language used in the high-profile medical/public health/epidemiology literature implied causality using language linking exposures to outcomes and action recommendations; examined disconnects between language and recommendations; identified the most common linking phrases; and estimated how strongly linking phrases imply causality. We searched for and screened 1,170 articles from 18 high-profile journals (65 per journal) published from 2010-2019. Based on written framing and systematic guidance, 3 reviewers rated the degree of causality implied in abstracts and full text for exposure/outcome linking language and action recommendations. Reviewers rated the causal implication of exposure/outcome linking language as none (no causal implication) in 13.8%, weak in 34.2%, moderate in 33.2%, and strong in 18.7% of abstracts. The implied causality of action recommendations was higher than the implied causality of linking sentences for 44.5% or commensurate for 40.3% of articles. The most common linking word in abstracts was "associate" (45.7%). Reviewers' ratings of linking word roots were highly heterogeneous; over half of reviewers rated "association" as having at least some causal implication. This research undercuts the assumption that avoiding "causal" words leads to clarity of interpretation in medical research.

Validation of the Romanian Communication Skills Ability Scale - CSAS-RO - A Tool for Medical Schools.

In medicine ability to communicate requires training and continuous development. Aim: To validate the Communication Skills Ability Scale in Romanian. Study design: cross-sectional observational interrupted large case series. Sample and setting: all year 5 medical undergraduate students enrolled at UMF Carol Davila, Bucharest (UMFCD). A two field tests study: 1) 2nd semester of the 2017/2018 academic year (n = 361); 2) 2018/2019 academic year (n = 703). Methodology: The Romanian translation of CSAS® was used. Results: The CSAS-RO confirms the 2-Factor scale; internal consistency: Cronbach-α coefficient was 0.894 for the PAS (0.870 CSAS®) and 0.754 for the NAS (0.805 CSAS®) All item-total and item-rest correlations satisfied the criterion of more than 0.30, ranging from 0.32 to 0.71 with the exception of items 17 (field test 1) and item 11 (field test 2). Conclusion: CSAS-RO is valid to use with medical students. The reuse of the scale with a longitudinal study design will allow to assess any new educational needs for communication ability in medical students plus add the remaining property to test (the test-retest reliability).

Toward Standardizing a Lexicon of Infectious Disease Modeling Terms.

Disease modeling is increasingly being used to evaluate the effect of health intervention strategies, particularly for infectious diseases. However, the utility and application of such models are hampered by the inconsistent use of infectious disease modeling terms between and within disciplines. We sought to standardize the lexicon of infectious disease modeling terms and develop a glossary of terms commonly used in describing models' assumptions, parameters, variables, and outcomes. We combined a comprehensive literature review of relevant terms with an online forum discussion in a virtual community of practice, mod4PH (Modeling for Public Health). Using a convergent discussion process and consensus amongst the members of mod4PH, a glossary of terms was developed as an online resource. We anticipate that the glossary will improve inter- and intradisciplinary communication and will result in a greater uptake and understanding of disease modeling outcomes in heath policy decision-making. We highlight the role of the mod4PH community of practice and the methodologies used in this endeavor to link theory, policy, and practice in the public health domain.